These insights concern the Convention dimension of cases decided by national courts: what remains to be examined under the Convention once the final domestic decision has been delivered.
Each series concerns a particular legal system. Just Rights Europe does not replace the lawyers conducting the domestic proceedings; the firm acts solely on the Convention dimension of a case, after the final decision of the highest national court.
The European Court of Human Rights as the supranational forum for a State outside the European Union, and what follows from Monaco's non-ratification of Protocol No. 1.
Admissibility, confiscation, access to a court and fair trial: the Convention dimension of cases decided by the Luxembourg Cour de cassation.
Admissibility, the four-month time limit, Article 3 in Belgian prisons and reasons for assize verdicts: the Convention dimension of cases that have run their course before the Belgian courts.
Admissibility after the Court of Cassation, and what remains to be argued once an appeal on points of law has been dismissed: the Convention dimension of cases that have run their course before the French courts.
Admissibility, privacy, extradition and life imprisonment: what the Strasbourg case-law, shaped by cases against the United Kingdom, requires after a Supreme Court judgment or before a person is surrendered.
These notes are general information on Convention law; they do not constitute legal advice and do not create a lawyer-client relationship.
After the final decision of the highest national court, a case may be submitted to us directly, by the client or by their lawyer.